Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. SNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and SNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTSNA
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationSnap-on Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
Market Capitalization116.50 billion USD18.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and SNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. SNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
5-Day Price Return3.03%2.08%
13-Week Price Return7.10%11.36%
26-Week Price Return12.82%2.69%
52-Week Price Return-14.64%20.11%
Month-to-Date Return-0.04%6.55%
Year-to-Date Return2.69%2.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.39M0.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.64M0.32M
3-Month Volatility25.98%24.43%
Beta0.240.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SNA

18.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.10% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SNA

19.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.72% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA

25.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.57% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Return on Equity (TTM)65.82%18.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%12.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%19.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.29%25.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%51.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SNA

4.48

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.994.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.833.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.060.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4965.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

2.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.64%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SNA

2.41%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SNA

43.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.42% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.64%2.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)73.60%43.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

27.89

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 27.89 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNA

18.04

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 18.04 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.63

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNA

3.56

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.56 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SNA

2.85

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 2.85 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.8918.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.633.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.342.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.5217.65