Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. SNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and SNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTSNA
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationSnap-on Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
Market Capitalization109.35 billion USD17.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and SNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. SNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
5-Day Price Return3.02%-3.85%
13-Week Price Return6.45%1.22%
26-Week Price Return1.29%0.81%
52-Week Price Return-16.49%-8.66%
Month-to-Date Return-5.31%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return-4.15%-2.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.32M0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.56M0.32M
3-Month Volatility16.93%19.91%
Beta0.260.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

68.48%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 68.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SNA

18.07%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.07% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.73%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SNA

19.83%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

SNA’s Net Profit Margin of 19.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.31% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA

25.80%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.80% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Return on Equity (TTM)68.48%18.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.26%12.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.73%19.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.31%25.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%51.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

1.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

LMT’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNA

4.40

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

3.59

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.59, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.134.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.973.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.590.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4965.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

2.87%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.87%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SNA

2.61%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.61% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

74.05%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.05% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SNA

44.15%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.15% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.87%2.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.05%44.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

25.77

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 25.77 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNA

16.92

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 16.92 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.48

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SNA

3.35

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

18.58

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

LMT’s P/B Ratio of 18.58 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SNA

3.09

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTSNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.7716.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.483.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.583.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.8216.72