Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTPOOL
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationPool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseDistributors
Market Capitalization104.13 billion USD11.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTPOOL
5-Day Price Return1.98%-3.42%
13-Week Price Return-5.72%-2.33%
26-Week Price Return2.59%-7.45%
52-Week Price Return-20.13%-8.87%
Month-to-Date Return5.94%2.21%
Year-to-Date Return-8.22%-7.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.47M0.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.66M0.59M
3-Month Volatility30.65%30.35%
Beta0.261.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)65.82%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.29%11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.992.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.060.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4912.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)73.60%44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

24.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.64 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.44

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LMT vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6429.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.442.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.348.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7824.87