LMT vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LMT and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LMT is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	LMT	PAC
Company Name	Lockheed Martin Corporation	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	104.61 billion USD	10.80 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LMT	PAC
5-Day Price Return	-6.78%	0.67%
13-Week Price Return	6.06%	-11.36%
26-Week Price Return	-4.08%	-6.30%
52-Week Price Return	-18.07%	11.84%
Month-to-Date Return	-8.09%	2.92%
Year-to-Date Return	-6.96%	8.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.34M	1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.56M	0.74M
3-Month Volatility	17.33%	24.19%
Beta	0.26	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

68.48%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 37.11%
Q3: 20.14%
Median: 11.72%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 68.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

45.58%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 25.25%
Q3: 15.14%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 6.63%
Min: 1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 45.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.73%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.66%
Q3: 8.61%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: 4.92%
Min: 1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

24.13%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 56.87%
Q3: 32.94%
Median: 20.37%
Q1: 11.21%
Min: 1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 24.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 22.35%
Q3: 12.83%
Median: 9.29%
Q1: 6.38%
Min: -2.15%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.31% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC

41.95%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.60%
Q3: 46.73%
Median: 31.03%
Q1: 15.90%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.95% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LMT	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	68.48%	45.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.26%	12.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	5.73%	24.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	8.31%	41.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	8.25%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

1.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.77

LMT’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

1.29

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 2.90
Q3: 1.82
Median: 1.16
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

3.59

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 0.96
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.59, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PAC

2.53

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.64
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.53. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.08
Median: 7.25
Q1: 2.65
Min: -7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.45
Median: 7.97
Q1: 4.97
Min: 2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LMT	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.13	1.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.97	1.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.59	2.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.49	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.72%
Q3: 1.45%
Median: 0.48%
Q1: 0.08%
Min: 0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

PAC

5.32%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 8.64%
Q3: 4.96%
Median: 2.38%
Q1: 1.83%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.32%, PAC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

74.05%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 110.40%
Q3: 50.43%
Median: 17.11%
Q1: 0.46%
Min: 0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.05% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PAC

128.34%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 206.16%
Q3: 111.39%
Median: 71.16%
Q1: 37.58%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 128.34% is in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LMT	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.99%	5.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	74.05%	128.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

24.77

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 67.20
Q3: 55.74
Median: 33.28
Q1: 27.49
Min: 15.02

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PAC

17.45

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 33.87
Q3: 28.56
Median: 17.26
Q1: 11.95
Min: 6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 17.45 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 4.87
Median: 2.47
Q1: 1.61
Min: 0.33

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PAC

4.21

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.89
Q3: 5.40
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.62
Min: 0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

18.58

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.90
Q3: 8.93
Median: 4.70
Q1: 3.03
Min: 0.83

At 18.58, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

8.66

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.74
Q3: 3.00
Median: 1.96
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.38

At 8.66, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LMT vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LMT	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.77	17.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.42	4.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	18.58	8.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.93	21.74