Seek Returns logo

LLY vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LLY and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLLYUBER
Company NameEli Lilly and CompanyUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareIndustrials
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization592.10 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LLY and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LLY vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLLYUBER
5-Day Price Return3.06%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return-12.58%3.10%
26-Week Price Return-24.11%29.78%
52-Week Price Return-25.32%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return-10.75%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return-14.44%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.71M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.45M21.23M
3-Month Volatility41.63%32.88%
Beta0.451.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LLY

88.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 88.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

25.91%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.91% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

32.37%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.37% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLLYUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)88.36%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.02%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.91%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.37%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.64%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

1.28

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

2.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLLYUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.281.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.530.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.180.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.36-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

LLY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LLY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LLY

0.82%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.82% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LLY

36.46%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.46% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLLYUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.82%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.46%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LLY

44.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 44.55, LLY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LLY

11.54

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 11.54, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

40.43

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

At 40.43, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LLY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLLYUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)44.5514.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.544.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)40.438.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)305.9422.17