Seek Returns logo

LLY vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LLY and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLLYTMUS
Company NameEli Lilly and CompanyT-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareCommunication Services
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization623.33 billion USD283.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LLY and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LLY vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLLYTMUS
5-Day Price Return-1.12%-2.51%
13-Week Price Return-2.78%4.53%
26-Week Price Return-19.81%-4.41%
52-Week Price Return-27.13%28.15%
Month-to-Date Return-6.05%5.59%
Year-to-Date Return-9.93%14.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.47M3.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.51M4.42M
3-Month Volatility40.35%23.82%
Beta0.450.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LLY

88.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 88.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

25.91%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.91% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

32.37%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.37% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLLYTMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)88.36%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.02%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.91%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.37%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.64%63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

1.28

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

2.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLLYTMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.281.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.531.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.181.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.365.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

LLY vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LLY vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LLY

0.77%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LLY

36.46%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.46% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLLYTMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.77%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.46%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LLY

47.48

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 47.48, LLY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LLY

12.30

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 12.30, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

40.43

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

At 40.43, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LLY vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLLYTMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)47.4823.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.303.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)40.434.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)326.0323.69