Seek Returns logo

LLY vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LLY and MU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLLYMU
Company NameEli Lilly and CompanyMicron Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareInformation Technology
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization916.61 billion USD280.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972June 1, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LLY and MU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LLY vs. MU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLLYMU
5-Day Price Return6.07%-2.55%
13-Week Price Return46.21%104.21%
26-Week Price Return37.43%154.65%
52-Week Price Return26.30%147.03%
Month-to-Date Return18.82%10.31%
Year-to-Date Return32.81%193.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.24M27.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.43M23.51M
3-Month Volatility32.04%55.76%
Beta0.321.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LLY

102.26%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.95%
Q3
20.34%
Median
11.59%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-10.91%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 102.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MU

17.05%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

MU’s Return on Equity of 17.05% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

30.99%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
39.07%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.48%
Q1
5.73%
Min
-8.86%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.99% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MU

22.84%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 22.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LLY

38.84%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.58%
Q3
24.35%
Median
18.05%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-11.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 38.84% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MU

26.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.14% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLLYMU
Return on Equity (TTM)102.26%17.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.18%11.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.99%22.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)38.84%26.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.03%39.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

1.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
5.45
Q3
2.99
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
0.78

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MU

2.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.52 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

1.79

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.79
Q3
0.78
Median
0.31
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MU

0.27

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
10.15
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLLYMU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.552.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.741.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.790.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.3620.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

LLY vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LLY vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LLY

0.54%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.72%
Q3
3.48%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.54% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MU

0.18%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LLY

28.28%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
85.87%
Median
49.36%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.28% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MU

6.11%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.11% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLLYMU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.54%0.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.28%6.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LLY

52.64

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
52.64
Q3
29.89
Median
20.77
Q1
13.37
Min
5.71

A P/E Ratio of 52.64 places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MU

33.34

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

MU’s P/E Ratio of 33.34 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LLY

16.31

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.74
Q3
4.66
Median
2.37
Q1
1.67
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 16.31, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MU

7.62

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

MU’s P/S Ratio of 7.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LLY

30.35

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.86
Q3
5.28
Median
2.48
Q1
1.57
Min
0.59

At 30.35, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MU

2.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LLY vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLLYMU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)52.6433.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.317.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)30.352.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)120.60159.87
LLY vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison