LIN vs. V: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 2, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LIN and V, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LIN	V
Company Name	Linde plc	Visa Inc.
Country	United Kingdom	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Financials
GICS Industry	Chemicals	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	222.46 billion USD	654.82 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 17, 1992	March 19, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and V by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN vs. V: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	V
5-Day Price Return	0.18%	0.80%
13-Week Price Return	1.24%	-3.85%
26-Week Price Return	2.94%	-0.81%
52-Week Price Return	-0.94%	24.06%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.69%	-2.96%
Year-to-Date Return	13.45%	8.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.87M	7.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.75M	6.38M
3-Month Volatility	12.74%	16.67%
Beta	0.93	0.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 29.52%
Q3: 13.18%
Median: 6.53%
Q1: 1.35%
Min: -11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 20.20%
Q3: 9.15%
Median: 3.94%
Q1: 0.60%
Min: -10.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 27.33%
Q3: 13.82%
Median: 7.98%
Q1: 3.60%
Min: -7.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	V
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.46%	52.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.10%	21.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	20.20%	52.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	26.75%	62.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	48.45%	80.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.69
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.75

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max: 1.53
Q3: 1.00
Median: 0.69
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max: 56.43
Q3: 26.33
Median: 8.84
Q1: 2.54
Min: -9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	V
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.70	1.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.67	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	33.09	24.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LIN vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.25%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.67%
Median: 2.44%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: 0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.25% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 192.00%
Q3: 108.95%
Median: 57.38%
Q1: 27.28%
Min: 0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	V
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.25%	0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	40.71%	22.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

32.60

Chemicals Industry

Max: 49.43
Q3: 32.03
Median: 21.32
Q1: 14.93
Min: 8.66

A P/E Ratio of 32.60 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

V

32.84

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 32.84 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.58

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.90
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.15

With a P/S Ratio of 6.58, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

V

17.13

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max: 5.01
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.50
Q1: 0.95
Min: 0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LIN vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	V
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	32.60	32.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.58	17.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.73	17.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	43.18	30.17