Seek Returns

LIN vs. RTNTF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at LIN and RTNTF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLINRTNTF
Company NameLinde plcRio Tinto Group
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsMetals & Mining
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial GasesDiversified Metals & Mining
Market Capitalization228.33 billion USD201.64 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSOTC Markets OTCPK
Listing DateJune 17, 1992November 24, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

LIN’s market capitalization stands at 228.33 billion USD, while RTNTF’s is 201.64 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and RTNTF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN
RTNTF
Loading price history…
LIN vs. RTNTF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
5-Day Price Return-2.77%4.81%
13-Week Price Return4.34%13.05%
26-Week Price Return14.87%35.08%
52-Week Price Return9.83%53.59%
Month-to-Date Return-1.45%7.67%
Year-to-Date Return15.82%22.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M1.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.49M1.45M
3-Month Volatility20.93%33.37%
Beta0.751.04

With betas of 0.75 for LIN and 1.04 for RTNTF, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

18.40%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.95%
Q3
13.87%
Median
5.23%
Q1
0.88%
Min
-17.79%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 18.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RTNTF

19.57%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
44.53%
Q3
18.99%
Median
9.89%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-23.03%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, RTNTF’s Return on Equity of 19.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.44%

Chemicals Industry
Max
23.93%
Q3
9.84%
Median
3.65%
Q1
0.22%
Min
-13.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.44% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RTNTF

17.29%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
50.86%
Q3
22.67%
Median
8.44%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-28.40%

RTNTF’s Net Profit Margin of 17.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.48%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.08%
Q3
14.25%
Median
7.90%
Q1
3.16%
Min
-12.86%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.48% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RTNTF

25.91%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
74.29%
Q3
35.22%
Median
13.34%
Q1
2.93%
Min
-43.05%

RTNTF’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.91% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
Return on Equity (TTM)18.40%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.21%10.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.44%17.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%25.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.77%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.83

Chemicals Industry
Max
3.68
Q3
2.40
Median
1.78
Q1
1.43
Min
0.83

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RTNTF

1.70

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
4.53
Q3
2.93
Median
2.03
Q1
1.55
Min
0.02

RTNTF’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.68

Chemicals Industry
Max
1.54
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RTNTF

0.26

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
1.18
Q3
0.53
Median
0.28
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

RTNTF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

34.45

Chemicals Industry
Max
56.43
Q3
24.34
Median
7.57
Q1
2.54
Min
-21.49

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.45 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RTNTF

9.07

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
47.59
Q3
20.29
Median
5.88
Q1
0.78
Min
-24.82

RTNTF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.831.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.621.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.680.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.459.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)8.25%14.56%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)4.96%7.42%
3-Year Revenue CAGR0.62%1.24%
5-Year Revenue CAGR4.52%5.26%

EPS Growth

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)13.37%-5.79%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)9.36%-14.04%
3-Year EPS CAGR21.09%-7.16%
5-Year EPS CAGR25.41%0.28%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.24%

Chemicals Industry
Max
6.69%
Q3
3.62%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.05%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTNTF

3.43%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
4.80%
Q3
2.00%
Median
0.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.43%, RTNTF offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.16%

Chemicals Industry
Max
195.45%
Q3
117.45%
Median
55.57%
Q1
29.71%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.16% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTNTF

61.66%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
146.71%
Q3
58.80%
Median
20.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RTNTF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.66% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.24%3.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.16%61.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

32.26

Chemicals Industry
Max
77.15
Q3
42.55
Median
23.94
Q1
14.14
Min
7.94

LIN’s P/E Ratio of 32.26 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RTNTF

17.99

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
57.98
Q3
34.47
Median
21.20
Q1
15.71
Min
6.17

RTNTF’s P/E Ratio of 17.99 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.59

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.80
Q3
2.35
Median
1.15
Q1
0.67
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.59, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RTNTF

3.11

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
9.76
Q3
4.90
Median
2.82
Q1
1.04
Min
0.21

RTNTF’s P/S Ratio of 3.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.96

Chemicals Industry
Max
5.00
Q3
2.81
Median
1.70
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

At 5.96, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RTNTF

2.23

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
7.40
Q3
3.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.28
Min
0.41

RTNTF’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN vs. RTNTF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLINRTNTF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.2617.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.593.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.962.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.8339.86