Seek Returns logo

LIN vs. NFLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LIN and NFLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLINNFLX
Company NameLinde plcNetflix, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryChemicalsEntertainment
Market Capitalization225.86 billion USD511.89 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 17, 1992May 23, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and NFLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN vs. NFLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLINNFLX
5-Day Price Return0.66%-3.25%
13-Week Price Return5.75%0.84%
26-Week Price Return3.40%16.30%
52-Week Price Return4.31%72.80%
Month-to-Date Return4.65%3.90%
Year-to-Date Return15.05%35.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.46M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.74M3.71M
3-Month Volatility12.84%25.00%
Beta0.961.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NFLX

42.50%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NFLX’s Return on Equity of 42.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NFLX

24.58%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.58% places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NFLX

29.51%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.51% places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLINNFLX
Return on Equity (TTM)17.46%42.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.10%19.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.20%24.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.75%29.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.45%48.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NFLX

1.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NFLX’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NFLX

0.58

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NFLX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

NFLX

23.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

NFLX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLINNFLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.701.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.0923.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. NFLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LIN vs. NFLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NFLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NFLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NFLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NFLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLINNFLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.21%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.71%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NFLX

49.96

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

A P/E Ratio of 49.96 places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NFLX

12.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NFLX’s P/S Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NFLX

22.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 22.84, NFLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LIN vs. NFLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLINNFLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.6949.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.8012.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.7322.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.6260.23