Seek Returns logo

LII vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LII and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LII is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLIIPAC
Company NameLennox International Inc.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization20.04 billion USD12.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 29, 1999February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LII and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LII vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIIPAC
5-Day Price Return-7.00%-2.95%
13-Week Price Return-0.71%-0.18%
26-Week Price Return-12.38%13.31%
52-Week Price Return-0.59%51.23%
Month-to-Date Return-6.32%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return-6.36%25.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.40M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M0.69M
3-Month Volatility31.49%24.54%
Beta1.141.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIIPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)99.44%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.03%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.41%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.52%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.13%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIIPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.710.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.312.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.815.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

LII vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LII vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LII

0.77%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIIPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.77%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.61%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LII

25.59

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

LII’s P/E Ratio of 25.59 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LII

3.94

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LII vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIIPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.5919.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.944.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.599.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.8118.23