Seek Returns logo

LII vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LII and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLIILUV
Company NameLennox International Inc.Southwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization19.48 billion USD17.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 29, 1999January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LII and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LII vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIILUV
5-Day Price Return1.46%0.43%
13-Week Price Return-7.94%-6.05%
26-Week Price Return1.42%12.44%
52-Week Price Return-6.63%4.54%
Month-to-Date Return4.76%1.69%
Year-to-Date Return-8.98%-3.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.45M8.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.38M10.22M
3-Month Volatility32.68%39.85%
Beta1.181.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIILUV
Return on Equity (TTM)99.44%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.03%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.41%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.52%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.13%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIILUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.710.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.310.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.819.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

LII vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LII vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LII

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LUV

2.51%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.51% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIILUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%2.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.61%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LII

23.35

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

LII’s P/E Ratio of 23.35 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

43.42

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

At 43.42, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LII

3.60

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.60 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV

0.62

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LII vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIILUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.3543.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.600.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.592.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.2845.38