Seek Returns logo

LI vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LI and VIPS are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolLIVIPS
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryChinaChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization25.51 billion USD10.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020March 23, 2012
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIVIPS
5-Day Price Return-0.50%6.34%
13-Week Price Return-3.95%35.42%
26-Week Price Return-3.49%29.46%
52-Week Price Return142.14%17.34%
Month-to-Date Return-1.78%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return6.01%50.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.94M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.41M2.84M
3-Month Volatility46.02%29.15%
Beta1.250.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.44% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.75%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.75% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.44%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.05%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.64%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.75%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.64%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.37

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.731.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.501.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.94150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

23.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

A P/E Ratio of 23.31 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VIPS

10.35

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.31 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.3110.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.310.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.871.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.56--