Seek Returns logo

LI vs. TCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and TCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LI and TCOM are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolLITCOM
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Trip.com Group Limited
CountryChinaSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization23.93 billion USD42.43 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020December 9, 2003
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and TCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. TCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLITCOM
5-Day Price Return-3.71%1.45%
13-Week Price Return-18.72%3.57%
26-Week Price Return-9.20%-9.17%
52-Week Price Return142.14%24.59%
Month-to-Date Return-11.13%2.64%
Year-to-Date Return-1.81%-6.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.27M2.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.53M2.44M
3-Month Volatility47.62%26.84%
Beta1.351.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TCOM

12.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

TCOM’s Return on Equity of 12.21% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TCOM

32.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

TCOM’s Net Profit Margin of 32.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TCOM

26.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.60% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLITCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%12.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%6.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%32.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%26.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%81.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TCOM

1.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

TCOM’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TCOM

0.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TCOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TCOM

9.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

TCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLITCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.871.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.641.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.130.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.949.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLITCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TCOM

17.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

TCOM’s P/E Ratio of 17.95 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TCOM

5.74

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

TCOM’s P/S Ratio of 5.74 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TCOM

2.13

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

TCOM’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LI vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLITCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2817.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.195.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.712.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.74--