Seek Returns logo

LI vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SW is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLISW
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryChinaIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryAutomobilesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization23.93 billion USD23.98 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020June 17, 2008
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLISW
5-Day Price Return1.02%6.39%
13-Week Price Return-14.06%3.26%
26-Week Price Return-6.11%-16.97%
52-Week Price Return142.14%4.89%
Month-to-Date Return-9.01%3.49%
Year-to-Date Return0.53%-14.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.06M4.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.68M3.65M
3-Month Volatility47.84%33.34%
Beta1.351.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLISW
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLISW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.871.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.640.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.130.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.942.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW

3.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLISW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SW

41.59

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 41.59, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SW

0.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LI vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLISW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2841.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.190.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.711.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7442.07