Seek Returns logo

LI vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LI and SE are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolLISE
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Sea Limited
CountryChinaSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryAutomobilesEntertainment
Market Capitalization23.90 billion USD105.82 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020October 20, 2017
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLISE
5-Day Price Return-3.61%2.72%
13-Week Price Return-20.22%9.85%
26-Week Price Return-8.67%34.26%
52-Week Price Return142.14%117.37%
Month-to-Date Return-11.22%14.10%
Year-to-Date Return-1.92%68.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.71M5.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.69M4.42M
3-Month Volatility48.49%50.35%
Beta1.351.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLISE
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLISE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.871.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.641.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.130.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.94-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLISE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LI vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLISE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2888.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.195.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.719.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7432.38