Seek Returns logo

LI vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SCI is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLISCI
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Service Corporation International
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization25.20 billion USD11.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLISCI
5-Day Price Return0.73%3.36%
13-Week Price Return-13.87%7.17%
26-Week Price Return7.47%6.74%
52-Week Price Return142.14%10.61%
Month-to-Date Return-6.41%7.52%
Year-to-Date Return3.41%2.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.98M1.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume17.25M1.14M
3-Month Volatility49.59%16.83%
Beta1.350.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.65%
Q3
29.77%
Median
16.63%
Q1
11.08%
Min
2.26%

SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
18.84%
Q3
13.34%
Median
12.22%
Q1
7.92%
Min
3.76%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
19.23%
Median
15.23%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLISCI
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%32.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%3.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%12.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%22.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%26.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.97
Median
1.66
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.22
Median
0.36
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
13.44
Q3
10.58
Median
5.57
Q1
3.04
Min
-2.17

SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLISCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.870.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.640.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.133.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.943.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI

1.55%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
0.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.55%, SCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLISCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.30

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.30 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SCI

21.45

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
33.95
Q3
25.14
Median
19.27
Q1
15.30
Min
5.58

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.45 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SCI

2.70

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.29
Q3
2.54
Median
2.27
Q1
1.92
Min
1.28

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper echelon for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.70

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.00
Q3
6.37
Median
3.31
Q1
2.13
Min
0.98

At 7.43, SCI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LI vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLISCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.3021.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.192.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.707.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7418.18