Seek Returns logo

LI vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, PKG is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLIPKG
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Packaging Corporation of America
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryAutomobilesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization23.93 billion USD17.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020January 28, 2000
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIPKG
5-Day Price Return-3.71%0.81%
13-Week Price Return-18.72%1.89%
26-Week Price Return-9.20%-6.61%
52-Week Price Return142.14%0.56%
Month-to-Date Return-11.13%2.26%
Year-to-Date Return-1.81%-12.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.27M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.53M0.74M
3-Month Volatility47.62%22.98%
Beta1.350.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.873.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.642.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.130.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.9426.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PKG

19.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.67 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PKG

2.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LI vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2819.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.192.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.713.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7428.54