Seek Returns logo

LI vs. ONON: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and ONON, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, ONON is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLIONON
Company NameLi Auto Inc.On Holding AG
CountryChinaSwitzerland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization25.51 billion USD13.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020September 15, 2021
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and ONON by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. ONON: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIONON
5-Day Price Return-0.50%-3.42%
13-Week Price Return-3.95%-22.48%
26-Week Price Return-3.49%-4.14%
52-Week Price Return142.14%-14.45%
Month-to-Date Return-1.78%-0.59%
Year-to-Date Return6.01%-23.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.94M5.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.41M5.78M
3-Month Volatility46.02%41.25%
Beta1.252.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.44% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ONON

9.86%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

ONON’s Return on Equity of 9.86% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ONON

5.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

ONON’s Net Profit Margin of 5.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.75%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.75% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ONON

10.87%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

ONON’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.87% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIONON
Return on Equity (TTM)11.44%9.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.05%5.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.64%5.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.75%10.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.64%61.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ONON

2.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

ONON’s Current Ratio of 2.53 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.37

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ONON

0.36

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ONON’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ONON

1.62

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, ONON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIONON
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.732.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.501.94
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.941.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. ONON: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. ONON: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ONON

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

ONON currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ONON

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

ONON has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIONON
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

23.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

A P/E Ratio of 23.31 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ONON

80.65

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 80.65, ONON’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.31 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ONON

4.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

ONON’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ONON

9.68

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

ONON’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LI vs. ONON: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIONON
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.3180.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.314.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.879.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.5629.45