Seek Returns logo

LI vs. MCD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and MCD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MCD is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLIMCD
Company NameLi Auto Inc.McDonald's Corporation
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization23.90 billion USD223.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020July 5, 1966
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and MCD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. MCD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIMCD
5-Day Price Return-3.61%1.34%
13-Week Price Return-20.22%-2.54%
26-Week Price Return-8.67%0.99%
52-Week Price Return142.14%8.88%
Month-to-Date Return-11.22%4.34%
Year-to-Date Return-1.92%8.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.71M3.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.69M3.50M
3-Month Volatility48.49%15.56%
Beta1.350.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCD

95.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

MCD’s Return on Equity of 95.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MCD

32.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

MCD’s Net Profit Margin of 32.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCD

45.80%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

MCD’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIMCD
Return on Equity (TTM)11.89%95.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%14.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.59%32.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.44%45.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%57.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MCD

1.30

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

MCD’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MCD

40.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 40.64, MCD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MCD

9.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

MCD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIMCD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.871.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.641.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.1340.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.949.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. MCD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. MCD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCD

2.24%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCD’s Dividend Yield of 2.24% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCD

59.51%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIMCD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%59.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

21.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.28 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MCD

26.59

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

MCD’s P/E Ratio of 26.59 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MCD

8.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 8.56, MCD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MCD

160.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 160.46, MCD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LI vs. MCD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIMCD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2826.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.198.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.71160.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7432.36