LI vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at LI and LVS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LVS is a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Li Auto Inc. | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | China | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Automobiles | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Market Capitalization | 26.24 billion USD | 37.60 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 30, 2020 | December 15, 2004 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of LI and LVS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 2.68% | 1.51% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -2.12% | 23.63% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 1.40% | 33.44% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 142.14% | 5.22% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 10.58% | -6.66% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 7.93% | 4.73% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 20.70M | 5.36M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 18.59M | 4.97M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 46.20% | 28.24% |
| Beta | 1.25 | 1.03 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
LI
11.44%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 28.52%
- Q3
- 12.70%
- Median
- 5.15%
- Q1
- -1.62%
- Min
- -18.19%
LI’s Return on Equity of 11.44% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
LVS
51.35%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 51.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
LI
5.64%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 8.82%
- Q3
- 5.80%
- Median
- 2.77%
- Q1
- -1.08%
- Min
- -10.15%
LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LVS
12.16%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
LVS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
LI
5.75%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 13.07%
- Q3
- 6.94%
- Median
- 4.50%
- Q1
- -2.17%
- Min
- -13.85%
LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.75% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LVS
21.36%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
LVS’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.36% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 11.44% | 51.35% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 5.05% | 6.64% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.64% | 12.16% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.75% | 21.36% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 20.64% | 46.98% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
LI
1.73
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.13
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.47
LI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
LVS
1.22
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
LVS’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
LI
0.37
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.07
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.05
LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LVS
7.95
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
LI
-16.94
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 77.87
- Q3
- 37.26
- Median
- 13.42
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- -49.07
LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
LVS
5.34
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.73 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.50 | 1.14 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.37 | 7.95 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -16.94 | 5.34 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
LI
0.00%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 10.85%
- Q3
- 4.84%
- Median
- 2.53%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
LVS
1.92%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LVS’s Dividend Yield of 1.92% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
LI
0.00%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 131.16%
- Q3
- 60.59%
- Median
- 36.73%
- Q1
- 5.97%
- Min
- 0.00%
LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
LVS
50.71%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 50.71% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
LI
23.18
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 31.95
- Q3
- 22.20
- Median
- 11.17
- Q1
- 7.39
- Min
- 4.54
A P/E Ratio of 23.18 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.
LVS
26.39
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
LVS’s P/E Ratio of 26.39 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
LI
1.31
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 1.49
- Q3
- 0.92
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.09
LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.31 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
LVS
3.21
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
LI
2.87
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.87
- Q3
- 1.83
- Median
- 0.79
- Q1
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.18
LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
LVS
15.44
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
LVS’s P/B Ratio of 15.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | LI | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 23.18 | 26.39 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.31 | 3.21 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.87 | 15.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 9.50 | 31.53 |