LHX vs. PWR: L3Harris vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do L3Harris (LHX) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
L3Harris (LHX) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 48.39 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -5.21% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.68% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.91% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.75% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.16% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.32 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.45 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.03% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.56% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.76% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.34% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.55% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.53% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.62% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.39% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.82% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.88 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LHX the richer one.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.92% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 46.09% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 carries an above-peer premium to book — PWR is pricier on assets.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.20 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.07 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.39 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.09% | 3.78% |