LHX vs. MMM: L3Harris vs. 3M Stock Comparison
How do L3Harris (LHX) and 3M (MMM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
L3Harris (LHX) and 3M (MMM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense while MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.
| Profile Item | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 3M Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Conglomerates |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Conglomerates |
| Market Capitalization | 48.39 billion USD | 95.67 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -5.21% | 16.26% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.68% | 38.64% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.91% | 8.14% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.75% | 27.61% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.97 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.16% | -48.86% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 3.14M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.32 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.45 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 72.97% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
72.97%
- MMM
- 72.97%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 14.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
14.01%
- Max
- 27.47%
- MMM
- 14.01%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.69%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MMM
- 23.69%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.03% | 72.97% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.56% | 8.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.76% | 14.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.34% | 23.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.55% | 39.53% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while 3M (MMM) at 1.52% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% and 3M (MMM) at -20.53% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.53% | 1.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.62% | -1.57% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.39% | -20.53% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.82% | -16.16% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 and 3M (MMM) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- MMM
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.04 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.04
- MMM
- 3.04
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 3.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.88 | 1.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% and 3M (MMM) at 1.64% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 2.66%
- MMM
- 1.64%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% and 3M (MMM) at 45.82% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
45.82%
- Max
- 67.39%
- MMM
- 45.82%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.92% | 1.64% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 46.09% | 45.82% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 and 3M (MMM) at 27.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
27.63
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MMM
- 27.63
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.79 sits in the pricier quartile — MMM costs more per dollar of sales.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.79
- Max
- 7.54
- MMM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 23.18 prices above its benchmark range — MMM looks rich relative to book.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.18
- MMM
- 23.18
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LHX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.20 | 27.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.07 | 3.79 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.39 | 23.18 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.09% | 6.66% |