LEN vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LEN is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	33.51 billion USD	10.01 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	1.87%	6.34%
13-Week Price Return	18.12%	35.42%
26-Week Price Return	13.32%	29.46%
52-Week Price Return	-27.66%	17.34%
Month-to-Date Return	3.20%	3.36%
Year-to-Date Return	-0.74%	50.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.16M	2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.41M	2.84M
3-Month Volatility	37.85%	29.15%
Beta	1.43	0.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 27.70%
Q3: 17.40%
Median: 12.87%
Q1: 7.33%
Min: -5.50%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 47.53%
Q3: 31.20%
Median: 16.63%
Q1: 10.81%
Min: -7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 16.37%
Q3: 9.18%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 3.85%
Min: -3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 24.63%
Q3: 12.77%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 4.50%
Min: -1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 21.32%
Q3: 12.25%
Median: 9.93%
Q1: 5.57%
Min: -1.07%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.48%
Q3: 17.60%
Median: 10.82%
Q1: 7.76%
Min: -6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.95%	17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.66%	9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.20%	6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.25%	7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.73%	23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 2.54
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.83

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.89
Q3: 0.87
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.01
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 21.16
Median: 8.60
Q1: 3.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.60%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.61%
Q3: 3.97%
Median: 2.00%
Q1: 0.18%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 4.06%
Q3: 2.07%
Median: 0.37%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 129.55%
Q3: 65.55%
Median: 42.15%
Q1: 6.45%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 114.82%
Q3: 62.39%
Median: 28.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.60%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.45%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.30

Household Durables Industry

Max: 33.67
Q3: 19.33
Median: 12.58
Q1: 9.62
Min: 6.48

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.30 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

10.35

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 62.76
Q3: 32.50
Median: 17.65
Q1: 12.08
Min: 6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.95

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.54
Q3: 1.39
Median: 0.90
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.19

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.25
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 3.26
Q3: 2.01
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 8.81
Q3: 5.19
Median: 3.42
Q1: 1.75
Min: 0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LEN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.30	10.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.95	0.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	1.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.02	--