LEN vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

April 23, 2026

Here’s a clear look at LEN and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	TM
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Toyota Motor Corporation
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Durables & Apparel	Automobiles & Components
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Automobiles
GICS Sub-Industry	Homebuilding	Automobile Manufacturers
Market Capitalization	23.26 billion USD	265.84 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

LEN is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

TM’s market capitalization (265.84 billion USD) is significantly greater than LEN’s (23.26 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

TM is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. LEN, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN+3.40%

TM+44.44%

LEN vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
5-Day Price Return	6.36%	-2.99%
13-Week Price Return	-17.98%	-10.63%
26-Week Price Return	-22.86%	9.01%
52-Week Price Return	-12.48%	14.38%
Month-to-Date Return	8.76%	3.73%
Year-to-Date Return	-8.12%	-2.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.82M	18.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.29M	22.54M
3-Month Volatility	35.27%	35.64%
Beta	1.49	1.33

With betas of 1.49 for LEN and 1.33 for TM, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

9.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 30.07%
Q3: 16.61%
Median: 11.62%
Q1: 7.53%
Min: -2.62%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 9.25% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM

9.96%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 29.64%
Q3: 10.26%
Median: 3.96%
Q1: -3.75%
Min: -19.13%

TM’s Return on Equity of 9.96% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

6.08%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.29%
Q3: 8.93%
Median: 6.47%
Q1: 3.89%
Min: -1.76%

LEN’s Net Profit Margin of 6.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

7.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.28%
Q3: 4.43%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: -1.49%
Min: -9.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.33% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

8.23%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.39%
Q3: 12.32%
Median: 8.70%
Q1: 6.17%
Min: -0.30%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.23% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

8.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 12.16%
Q3: 5.18%
Median: 2.75%
Q1: -3.61%
Min: -13.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 8.55% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.25%	9.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)	5.99%	3.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	6.08%	7.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	8.23%	8.55%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	10.38%	17.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

8.73

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.82
Q3: 3.99
Median: 2.60
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.76

LEN’s Current Ratio of 8.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TM

1.26

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.51

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 0.85
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TM

1.08

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.08
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.34
Min: 0.10

TM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobiles industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 64.89
Median: 17.95
Q1: 5.92
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TM

Automobiles Industry

Max: 132.59
Q3: 52.77
Median: 9.39
Q1: -3.83
Min: -60.25

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	8.73	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.75	1.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	1.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)	-5.82%	8.60%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)	-3.54%	7.92%
3-Year Revenue CAGR	0.51%	15.25%
5-Year Revenue CAGR	8.74%	9.97%

EPS Growth

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)	-52.64%	-42.32%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)	-44.42%	-26.04%
3-Year EPS CAGR	-20.29%	20.55%
5-Year EPS CAGR	0.24%	20.24%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

2.24%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.14%
Q3: 4.03%
Median: 2.23%
Q1: 0.65%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 2.24% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

2.80%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.92%
Q3: 5.45%
Median: 2.82%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 2.80% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

25.07%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 138.16%
Q3: 70.95%
Median: 48.36%
Q1: 7.08%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.07% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TM

59.03%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 172.78%
Q3: 81.19%
Median: 40.28%
Q1: 1.18%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.03% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.24%	2.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	25.07%	59.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.21

Household Durables Industry

Max: 34.28
Q3: 20.35
Median: 11.59
Q1: 9.53
Min: 3.72

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 11.21 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM

11.96

Automobiles Industry

Max: 149.64
Q3: 68.38
Median: 13.38
Q1: 9.19
Min: 6.17

TM’s P/E Ratio of 11.96 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.68

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.40
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.16

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM

0.88

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.73
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.48
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.11

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.24

Household Durables Industry

Max: 3.01
Q3: 1.94
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.69

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.12

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.97
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.14

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.12 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LEN vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.21	11.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.68	0.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	1.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	13.92	60.68