Seek Returns logo

LEN vs. SHAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LEN and SHAK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLENSHAK
Company NameLennar CorporationShake Shack Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization32.45 billion USD3.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 30, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and SHAK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. SHAK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLENSHAK
5-Day Price Return0.28%-1.75%
13-Week Price Return13.95%-33.42%
26-Week Price Return6.93%0.30%
52-Week Price Return-29.87%-10.60%
Month-to-Date Return-5.33%-11.69%
Year-to-Date Return-3.82%-27.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.36M1.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.40M1.34M
3-Month Volatility38.58%44.44%
Beta1.371.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SHAK

4.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

SHAK’s Return on Equity of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SHAK

1.50%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, SHAK’s Net Profit Margin of 1.50% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SHAK

1.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

SHAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.32% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLENSHAK
Return on Equity (TTM)12.95%4.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.66%1.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.20%1.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.25%1.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.73%47.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SHAK

1.92

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

SHAK’s Current Ratio of 1.92 is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SHAK

0.53

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

SHAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SHAK

11.14

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

SHAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLENSHAK
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.621.92
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.021.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.9311.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. SHAK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. SHAK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SHAK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SHAK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SHAK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SHAK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLENSHAK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.63%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.45%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.07

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.07 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SHAK

200.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 200.88, SHAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SHAK

3.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

SHAK’s P/S Ratio of 3.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SHAK

11.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

SHAK’s P/B Ratio of 11.56 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LEN vs. SHAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLENSHAK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.07200.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.933.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.2011.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.6986.46