Seek Returns logo

LEN vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LEN and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LEN is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLENSE
Company NameLennar CorporationSea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesEntertainment
Market Capitalization33.57 billion USD105.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLENSE
5-Day Price Return-0.10%2.72%
13-Week Price Return17.23%9.85%
26-Week Price Return5.31%34.26%
52-Week Price Return-22.71%117.37%
Month-to-Date Return16.17%14.10%
Year-to-Date Return-0.55%68.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.40M5.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.93M4.42M
3-Month Volatility38.35%50.35%
Beta1.411.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLENSE
Return on Equity (TTM)12.95%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.66%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.20%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.25%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.73%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLENSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.621.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.021.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.93-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.58%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLENSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.45%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.41 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.96

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLENSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4188.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.965.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.209.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1932.38