LEN vs. RACE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and RACE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	RACE
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Ferrari N.V.
Country	United States	Italy
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	33.51 billion USD	89.16 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 21, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and RACE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. RACE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	RACE
5-Day Price Return	1.87%	4.78%
13-Week Price Return	18.12%	1.77%
26-Week Price Return	13.32%	5.90%
52-Week Price Return	-27.66%	2.48%
Month-to-Date Return	3.20%	3.33%
Year-to-Date Return	-0.74%	3.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.16M	0.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.41M	0.31M
3-Month Volatility	37.85%	31.42%
Beta	1.43	0.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 27.70%
Q3: 17.40%
Median: 12.87%
Q1: 7.33%
Min: -5.50%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RACE

45.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 28.52%
Q3: 12.70%
Median: 5.15%
Q1: -1.62%
Min: -18.19%

RACE’s Return on Equity of 45.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 16.37%
Q3: 9.18%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 3.85%
Min: -3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RACE

22.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 8.82%
Q3: 5.80%
Median: 2.77%
Q1: -1.08%
Min: -10.15%

RACE’s Net Profit Margin of 22.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 21.32%
Q3: 12.25%
Median: 9.93%
Q1: 5.57%
Min: -1.07%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RACE

29.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 6.94%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: -2.17%
Min: -13.85%

RACE’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	RACE
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.95%	45.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.66%	16.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.20%	22.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.25%	29.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.73%	51.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 2.54
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.83

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

RACE

2.08

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.52
Median: 1.29
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.47

RACE’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.89
Q3: 0.87
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RACE

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.07
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.05

RACE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RACE

181.49

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 37.26
Median: 13.42
Q1: 1.43
Min: -49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 181.49, RACE demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	RACE
Current Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	2.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	0.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	181.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.60%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.61%
Q3: 3.97%
Median: 2.00%
Q1: 0.18%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RACE

0.63%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.85%
Q3: 4.84%
Median: 2.53%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 129.55%
Q3: 65.55%
Median: 42.15%
Q1: 6.45%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RACE

44.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 131.16%
Q3: 60.59%
Median: 36.73%
Q1: 5.97%
Min: 0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.33% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	RACE
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.60%	0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.45%	44.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.30

Household Durables Industry

Max: 33.67
Q3: 19.33
Median: 12.58
Q1: 9.62
Min: 6.48

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.30 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RACE

51.93

Automobiles Industry

Max: 31.95
Q3: 22.20
Median: 11.17
Q1: 7.39
Min: 4.54

At 51.93, RACE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.95

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.54
Q3: 1.39
Median: 0.90
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.19

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RACE

11.90

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 11.90, RACE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 3.26
Q3: 2.01
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RACE

22.78

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 1.83
Median: 0.79
Q1: 0.47
Min: 0.18

At 22.78, RACE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LEN vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	RACE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.30	51.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.95	11.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	22.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.02	60.91