LEN vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	PKG
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Packaging Corporation of America
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Materials
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Containers & Packaging
Market Capitalization	33.74 billion USD	18.07 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	January 28, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	PKG
5-Day Price Return	9.52%	3.04%
13-Week Price Return	16.30%	5.46%
26-Week Price Return	2.86%	-5.43%
52-Week Price Return	-18.89%	3.86%
Month-to-Date Return	16.68%	3.63%
Year-to-Date Return	-0.12%	-10.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.94M	0.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.03M	0.78M
3-Month Volatility	39.07%	24.49%
Beta	1.42	0.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PKG

19.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 19.94% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	PKG
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.95%	19.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.66%	9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.20%	10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.25%	14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.73%	22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PKG

3.28

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.28 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG

0.55

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	PKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	3.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.99
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	0.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	26.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.60%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PKG

2.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKG

52.11%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.11% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	PKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.60%	2.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.45%	52.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.31

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.31 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PKG

19.89

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.89 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.95

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PKG

2.08

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG

3.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.96 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	PKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.31	19.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.95	2.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	3.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.05	34.17