LEN vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	MGA
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Magna International Inc.
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Automobile Components
Market Capitalization	29.90 billion USD	13.81 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 5, 1984
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	MGA
5-Day Price Return	-9.04%	-0.06%
13-Week Price Return	-13.19%	11.54%
26-Week Price Return	5.29%	35.42%
52-Week Price Return	-30.07%	11.13%
Month-to-Date Return	-7.81%	3.98%
Year-to-Date Return	-12.93%	14.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.19M	1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.57M	1.01M
3-Month Volatility	31.69%	26.93%
Beta	1.44	1.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

11.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.77%
Q3: 17.22%
Median: 11.18%
Q1: 6.35%
Min: -7.31%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 11.21% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

8.55%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.69%
Q3: 11.79%
Median: 7.47%
Q1: 4.51%
Min: -2.79%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 8.55% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

7.72%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 16.03%
Q3: 9.13%
Median: 6.61%
Q1: 3.40%
Min: -4.24%

LEN’s Net Profit Margin of 7.72% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 14.12%
Q3: 7.20%
Median: 4.94%
Q1: 1.95%
Min: -3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

10.32%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.79%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 9.44%
Q1: 5.22%
Min: -3.50%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.32% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

3.77%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 19.04%
Q3: 10.47%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 3.48%
Min: -2.44%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.77% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	MGA
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.21%	8.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.38%	3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.72%	2.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	10.32%	3.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	12.38%	13.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

9.39

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.43
Q3: 3.68
Median: 2.54
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.75

LEN’s Current Ratio of 9.39 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MGA

1.18

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.13
Q3: 2.54
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.24

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.77
Q3: 0.83
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA

0.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.14
Q3: 0.66
Median: 0.38
Q1: 0.21
Min: 0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 80.10
Q3: 36.86
Median: 11.36
Q1: 4.46
Min: -21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	MGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	9.39	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.76	0.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.24	0.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	8.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.77%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.27%
Q3: 3.94%
Median: 1.84%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.77% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA

3.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.83%
Q3: 3.13%
Median: 2.50%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.91%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

19.71%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 154.55%
Q3: 65.87%
Median: 40.54%
Q1: 6.74%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.71% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA

52.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 99.04%
Q3: 62.52%
Median: 37.81%
Q1: 27.27%
Min: 0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.47% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	MGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.77%	3.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	19.71%	52.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.17

Household Durables Industry

Max: 33.05
Q3: 20.97
Median: 12.60
Q1: 9.92
Min: 6.71

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 11.17 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

13.40

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 28.01
Q3: 22.74
Median: 15.58
Q1: 12.96
Min: 2.71

MGA’s P/E Ratio of 13.40 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.86

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.29
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.86
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.15

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.05
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.52

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.77
Q3: 2.08
Median: 1.44
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.52 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MGA

1.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 3.68
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.90
Min: 0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LEN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	MGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.17	13.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.86	0.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.52	1.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	13.43	6.22