LEN vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 8, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	LULU
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	lululemon athletica inc.
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	30.95 billion USD	23.38 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	July 27, 2007
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	LULU
5-Day Price Return	6.39%	-5.52%
13-Week Price Return	9.28%	-29.67%
26-Week Price Return	-11.76%	-52.56%
52-Week Price Return	-27.11%	-17.34%
Month-to-Date Return	6.39%	-2.72%
Year-to-Date Return	-8.92%	-48.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.64M	3.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.04M	3.22M
3-Month Volatility	38.07%	53.37%
Beta	1.40	1.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	LULU
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.95%	43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.66%	25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.20%	16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.25%	23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.73%	59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	LULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	2.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	0.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.73%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	LULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.73%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.45%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

9.53

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 9.53 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU

13.65

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	LULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	9.53	13.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.88	2.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	7.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	13.91	15.56