Seek Returns logo

LEA vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LEA and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLEAMGA
Company NameLear CorporationMagna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization5.48 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 9, 2009October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEA and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEA vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLEAMGA
5-Day Price Return-0.26%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return9.51%20.18%
26-Week Price Return6.99%10.53%
52-Week Price Return-10.20%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return9.29%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return8.82%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.50M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.66M1.51M
3-Month Volatility34.39%27.61%
Beta1.361.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEA

9.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

LEA’s Return on Equity of 9.91% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEA

2.05%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, LEA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEA

3.54%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

LEA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.54% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLEAMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)9.91%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.20%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.05%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.54%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEA

1.34

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

LEA’s Current Ratio of 1.34 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEA

0.55

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

LEA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEA

6.74

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

LEA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.74 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLEAMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.341.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.070.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.748.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEA vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEA vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEA

3.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

LEA’s Dividend Yield of 3.08% is consistent with its peers in the Automobile Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEA

35.99%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

LEA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.99% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLEAMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.08%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.99%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEA

11.70

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

LEA’s P/E Ratio of 11.70 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEA

0.24

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, LEA’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEA

1.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

LEA’s P/B Ratio of 1.00 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LEA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLEAMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7010.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.240.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.000.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.746.83