Seek Returns logo

LDOS vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LDOS and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LDOS is a standard domestic listing, while UMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLDOSUMC
Company NameLeidos Holdings, Inc.United Microelectronics Corporation
CountryUnited StatesTaiwan
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization23.11 billion USD17.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 17, 2006September 19, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LDOS and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LDOS vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUMC
5-Day Price Return0.96%2.70%
13-Week Price Return12.93%-15.44%
26-Week Price Return37.90%1.21%
52-Week Price Return19.99%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return12.85%0.84%
Year-to-Date Return25.06%-2.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.84M42.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.14M44.80M
3-Month Volatility24.66%22.76%
Beta0.710.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UMC

10.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.76% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UMC

16.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 16.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UMC

19.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)31.25%10.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.54%7.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.22%16.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.95%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.56%29.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UMC

1.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

UMC’s Current Ratio of 1.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UMC

0.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.20 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.501.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.090.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.64313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

LDOS vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LDOS vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LDOS

0.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.91% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UMC

7.29%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 7.29% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UMC

163.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.64% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.91%7.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.91%163.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

16.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UMC

13.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 13.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

1.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UMC

2.17

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.17 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UMC

1.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LDOS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4313.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.352.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.541.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.2014.05