Seek Returns logo

LDOS vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LDOS and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLDOSUBER
Company NameLeidos Holdings, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization24.43 billion USD191.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 17, 2006May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LDOS and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LDOS vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUBER
5-Day Price Return-2.77%-2.64%
13-Week Price Return7.76%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return23.15%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return-1.54%28.75%
Month-to-Date Return0.49%-5.06%
Year-to-Date Return32.87%51.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M20.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.81M17.13M
3-Month Volatility20.53%30.03%
Beta0.591.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LDOS

32.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

LDOS’s Return on Equity of 32.62% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.54% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)32.62%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.12%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.22%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.95%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.56%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

3.02

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 3.02 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.021.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.561.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.64-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

LDOS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LDOS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LDOS

1.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

18.69%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.69% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.69%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

32.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

A P/E Ratio of 32.54 places LDOS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

11.39

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.39 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

1.44

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

3.82

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

131.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 131.20, LDOS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LDOS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLDOSUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.5411.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.443.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)131.207.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.6321.89