Seek Returns logo

LDOS vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LDOS and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLDOSQXO
Company NameLeidos Holdings, Inc.QXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization24.43 billion USD11.71 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 17, 2006April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LDOS and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LDOS vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLDOSQXO
5-Day Price Return-2.77%-10.83%
13-Week Price Return7.76%-17.79%
26-Week Price Return23.15%5.74%
52-Week Price Return-1.54%11.36%
Month-to-Date Return0.49%-4.02%
Year-to-Date Return32.87%6.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M8.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.81M7.70M
3-Month Volatility20.53%50.10%
Beta0.592.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LDOS

32.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

LDOS’s Return on Equity of 32.62% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QXO

-2.38%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.30%
Median
12.90%
Q1
9.19%
Min
-4.19%

QXO has a negative Return on Equity of -2.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QXO

-3.81%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
9.73%
Median
6.00%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-3.81%

QXO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.81%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QXO

-5.46%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.07%
Q3
13.61%
Median
7.26%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-7.51%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.46%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLDOSQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)32.62%-2.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.12%-1.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.22%-3.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.95%-5.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.56%22.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

3.02

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 3.02 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

QXO

3.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.62
Q3
2.33
Median
1.57
Q1
1.39
Min
0.27

QXO’s Current Ratio of 3.06 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QXO

0.33

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.19
Median
0.78
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.62
Q1
1.79
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLDOSQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.023.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.562.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.64-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

LDOS vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LDOS vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LDOS

1.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QXO

0.83%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.11%
Q3
2.73%
Median
2.07%
Q1
1.04%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

18.69%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.69% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
68.26%
Median
48.45%
Q1
22.66%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLDOSQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.69%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

32.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

A P/E Ratio of 32.54 places LDOS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QXO

--

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
37.92
Q3
24.64
Median
17.42
Q1
14.27
Min
5.07

P/E Ratio data for QXO is currently unavailable.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LDOS

1.44

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QXO

2.49

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.94
Q3
2.49
Median
1.08
Q1
0.75
Min
0.30

QXO’s P/S Ratio of 2.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LDOS

131.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 131.20, LDOS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QXO

1.31

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
4.66
Median
2.10
Q1
1.34
Min
0.31

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LDOS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLDOSQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.54--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.442.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)131.201.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.6342.69