Seek Returns logo

LCID vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LCID and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLCIDTSLA
Company NameLucid Group, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization7.19 billion USD1,094.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 18, 2020June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LCID and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LCID vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLCIDTSLA
5-Day Price Return7.83%5.31%
13-Week Price Return-10.69%6.60%
26-Week Price Return-19.03%-9.33%
52-Week Price Return-19.31%71.85%
Month-to-Date Return-4.88%10.09%
Year-to-Date Return-22.52%-15.96%
10-Day Avg. Volume85.03M80.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume135.32M110.74M
3-Month Volatility97.33%58.30%
Beta0.822.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LCID

-50.90%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LCID has a negative Return on Equity of -50.90%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LCID

-247.07%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LCID has a negative Net Profit Margin of -247.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LCID

-310.24%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LCID has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -310.24%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLCIDTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)-50.90%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)-25.35%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-247.07%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-310.24%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-99.26%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LCID

2.58

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LCID’s Current Ratio of 2.58 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LCID

0.58

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

LCID’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LCID

-4.66

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LCID has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLCIDTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.582.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.071.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.580.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.6671.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

LCID vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LCID vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LCID

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LCID currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LCID

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LCID has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLCIDTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LCID

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for LCID is currently unavailable.

TSLA

180.58

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 180.58, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LCID

7.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 7.71, LCID trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TSLA

11.81

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.81, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LCID

1.51

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LCID’s P/B Ratio of 1.51 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LCID vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLCIDTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--180.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.7111.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.5113.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--195.96