Seek Returns logo

LBRDA vs. PHI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LBRDA and PHI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LBRDA is a standard domestic listing, while PHI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLBRDAPHI
Company NameLiberty Broadband CorporationPLDT Inc.
CountryUnited StatesPhilippines
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryMediaWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization6.98 billion USD4.16 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 4, 2014May 3, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LBRDA and PHI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LBRDA vs. PHI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLBRDAPHI
5-Day Price Return-4.43%-0.97%
13-Week Price Return-17.26%-15.37%
26-Week Price Return-47.45%-13.40%
52-Week Price Return-49.42%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-9.33%-0.18%
Year-to-Date Return-34.78%-13.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.13M0.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.13M0.10M
3-Month Volatility30.19%19.99%
Beta1.000.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LBRDA

10.91%

Media Industry

Max
31.00%
Q3
15.18%
Median
10.91%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-5.88%

LBRDA’s Return on Equity of 10.91% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHI

27.45%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.26%
Median
13.73%
Q1
9.72%
Min
-1.57%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, PHI’s Return on Equity of 27.45% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LBRDA

103.04%

Media Industry

Max
20.69%
Q3
11.93%
Median
6.49%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-4.90%

LBRDA’s Net Profit Margin of 103.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Media industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PHI

14.64%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
23.76%
Q3
13.90%
Median
10.68%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-1.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.64% places PHI in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LBRDA

8.94%

Media Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
13.57%
Median
9.15%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-6.28%

LBRDA’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.94% is around the midpoint for the Media industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHI

24.86%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.15%
Q1
16.37%
Min
8.96%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.86% places PHI in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLBRDAPHI
Return on Equity (TTM)10.91%27.45%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.51%5.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)103.04%14.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.94%24.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)99.56%86.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LBRDA

0.24

Media Industry

Max
3.59
Q3
1.97
Median
1.28
Q1
0.86
Min
0.33

LBRDA’s Current Ratio of 0.24 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Media industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

PHI

0.37

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
0.98
Median
0.71
Q1
0.56
Min
0.37

PHI’s Current Ratio of 0.37 falls into the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LBRDA

0.22

Media Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.11
Median
0.55
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Media industry, LBRDA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHI

2.80

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.17
Median
1.52
Q1
0.93
Min
0.48

PHI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LBRDA

0.43

Media Industry

Max
58.38
Q3
25.12
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

LBRDA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.43 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

PHI

4.71

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.47
Median
3.79
Q1
1.76
Min
-0.02

PHI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLBRDAPHI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.240.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.240.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.222.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.434.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

LBRDA vs. PHI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LBRDA vs. PHI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LBRDA

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
8.07%
Q3
3.69%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LBRDA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHI

8.57%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
8.69%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.79%
Q1
2.67%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.57%, PHI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LBRDA

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
199.37%
Q3
102.15%
Median
47.09%
Q1
12.24%
Min
0.00%

LBRDA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHI

65.35%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
169.59%
Q3
122.96%
Median
73.67%
Q1
63.98%
Min
1.50%

PHI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.35% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLBRDAPHI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%8.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%65.35%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LBRDA

6.71

Media Industry

Max
73.10
Q3
36.19
Median
15.22
Q1
11.43
Min
5.11

In the lower quartile for the Media industry, LBRDA’s P/E Ratio of 6.71 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PHI

7.62

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
31.43
Q3
21.97
Median
16.89
Q1
12.46
Min
7.52

In the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, PHI’s P/E Ratio of 7.62 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LBRDA

6.91

Media Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.14
Median
1.10
Q1
0.85
Min
0.21

With a P/S Ratio of 6.91, LBRDA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Media industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PHI

1.12

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.65
Q3
2.21
Median
1.32
Q1
1.17
Min
0.62

In the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, PHI’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LBRDA

1.03

Media Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.53
Median
1.71
Q1
1.21
Min
0.56

LBRDA’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is in the lower quartile for the Media industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PHI

2.11

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.86
Median
2.07
Q1
1.40
Min
0.40

PHI’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LBRDA vs. PHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLBRDAPHI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)6.717.62
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.911.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.032.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)145.4613.20