Seek Returns logo

LAMR vs. REG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LAMR and REG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LAMR and REG are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolLAMRREG
Company NameLamar Advertising CompanyRegency Centers Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsRetail REITs
Market Capitalization12.41 billion USD13.10 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 2, 1996October 29, 1993
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LAMR and REG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LAMR vs. REG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLAMRREG
5-Day Price Return1.15%0.87%
13-Week Price Return2.85%-3.13%
26-Week Price Return-4.58%-4.36%
52-Week Price Return2.43%1.73%
Month-to-Date Return0.29%0.46%
Year-to-Date Return0.71%-2.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.03M1.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.62M1.09M
3-Month Volatility23.83%17.92%
Beta1.421.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LAMR

41.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

LAMR’s Return on Equity of 41.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

REG

6.01%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
15.84%
Q3
10.01%
Median
5.58%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.65%

REG’s Return on Equity of 6.01% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LAMR

19.72%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

REG

27.00%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
72.99%
Q3
48.25%
Median
27.21%
Q1
13.68%
Min
-25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LAMR

27.46%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

REG

35.86%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
53.88%
Median
35.05%
Q1
20.90%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLAMRREG
Return on Equity (TTM)41.90%6.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.68%3.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.72%27.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.46%35.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.58%70.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

0.58

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

LAMR’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

REG

0.68

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.87
Median
0.60
Q1
0.39
Min
0.04

REG’s Current Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the median group of the Retail REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

3.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

LAMR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialized REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

REG

0.72

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.36
Median
0.93
Q1
0.64
Min
0.28

REG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

3.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

LAMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

REG

4.31

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.35
Median
2.33
Q1
1.37
Min
0.52

REG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.31 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLAMRREG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.580.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.580.58
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.730.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.244.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

LAMR vs. REG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LAMR vs. REG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LAMR

5.16%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.16%, LAMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

REG

1.96%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.40%
Q3
4.96%
Median
4.61%
Q1
3.75%
Min
2.91%

REG’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is below the typical range for the Retail REITs industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

104.38%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

LAMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 104.38% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

REG

126.96%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
233.72%
Q3
148.83%
Median
90.03%
Q1
67.83%
Min
12.86%

REG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 126.96% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLAMRREG
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.16%1.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)104.38%126.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

27.77

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

REG

64.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
69.12
Q3
38.21
Median
21.85
Q1
15.96
Min
6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

5.48

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, LAMR’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

REG

17.49

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.84
Q3
9.05
Median
7.00
Q1
5.56
Min
2.93

With a P/S Ratio of 17.49, REG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Retail REITs industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

13.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 13.73, LAMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

REG

1.94

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.75
Q3
1.73
Median
1.08
Q1
0.87
Min
0.48

REG’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is in the upper tier for the Retail REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LAMR vs. REG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLAMRREG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.7764.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.4817.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.731.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.8881.90