Seek Returns logo

LAD vs. PAG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LAD and PAG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLADPAG
Company NameLithia Motors, Inc.Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization8.29 billion USD12.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 18, 1996October 23, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LAD and PAG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LAD vs. PAG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLADPAG
5-Day Price Return5.05%1.75%
13-Week Price Return5.17%14.99%
26-Week Price Return-11.19%10.30%
52-Week Price Return14.03%13.13%
Month-to-Date Return12.32%11.73%
Year-to-Date Return-9.50%22.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.31M0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M0.24M
3-Month Volatility35.42%29.17%
Beta1.310.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LAD

13.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

LAD’s Return on Equity of 13.20% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAG

17.87%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

PAG’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LAD

2.39%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, LAD’s Net Profit Margin of 2.39% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PAG

3.13%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

PAG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LAD

4.49%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

LAD’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.49% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAG

4.47%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

PAG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLADPAG
Return on Equity (TTM)13.20%17.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.79%5.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.39%3.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.49%4.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.43%16.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LAD

1.22

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

LAD’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAG

0.90

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

PAG’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LAD

1.96

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

LAD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.96. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAG

1.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

PAG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LAD

2.89

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, LAD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.89 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PAG

17.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

PAG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLADPAG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.220.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.290.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.961.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.8917.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

LAD vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LAD vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LAD

0.72%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LAD’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAG

2.62%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Yield of 2.62% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LAD

6.34%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LAD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.34% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAG

33.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.11% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLADPAG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.72%2.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.34%33.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LAD

8.87

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, LAD’s P/E Ratio of 8.87 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PAG

12.63

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/E Ratio of 12.63 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LAD

0.21

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, LAD’s P/S Ratio of 0.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PAG

0.40

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LAD

1.26

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

LAD’s P/B Ratio of 1.26 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PAG

2.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

PAG’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LAD vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLADPAG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.8712.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.210.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.262.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.2518.68