Seek Returns logo

KT vs. RCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KT and RCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RCI is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolKTRCI
Company NameKT CorporationRogers Communications Inc.
CountrySouth KoreaCanada
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryDiversified Telecommunication ServicesWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization9.98 billion USD19.38 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 26, 1999January 11, 1996
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KT and RCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KT vs. RCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKTRCI
5-Day Price Return-0.54%1.90%
13-Week Price Return7.21%36.74%
26-Week Price Return21.68%23.15%
52-Week Price Return-10.58%-10.37%
Month-to-Date Return-0.36%5.51%
Year-to-Date Return25.43%10.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.25M1.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M1.79M
3-Month Volatility23.13%20.88%
Beta-0.700.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KT

3.78%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
35.96%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.29%
Q1
-0.99%
Min
-18.19%

KT’s Return on Equity of 3.78% is on par with the norm for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RCI

13.98%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

RCI’s Return on Equity of 13.98% is on par with the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KT

2.38%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.05%
Median
6.85%
Q1
-0.81%
Min
-18.76%

KT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.38% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RCI

7.31%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

RCI’s Net Profit Margin of 7.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KT

3.68%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
15.73%
Q1
9.79%
Min
2.06%

KT’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.68% is in the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RCI

21.51%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

RCI’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.51% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKTRCI
Return on Equity (TTM)3.78%13.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.49%2.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.38%7.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.68%21.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.55%46.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KT

1.10

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.63
Q3
1.14
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.16

KT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RCI

1.70

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

RCI’s Current Ratio of 1.70 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KT

0.74

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.06
Median
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.11

KT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RCI

4.05

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.05, RCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KT

12.43

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
14.66
Q3
8.25
Median
3.53
Q1
1.47
Min
-2.60

KT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.43 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RCI

2.08

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

RCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKTRCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.744.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.432.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

KT vs. RCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KT vs. RCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KT

6.53%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.34%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.89%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.53%, KT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RCI

2.77%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

RCI’s Dividend Yield of 2.77% is consistent with its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KT

63.49%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
270.06%
Q3
135.21%
Median
76.62%
Q1
35.06%
Min
0.00%

KT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.49% is within the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RCI

48.65%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

RCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 48.65% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKTRCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.53%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.49%48.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KT

21.05

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
33.39
Q3
23.91
Median
16.72
Q1
13.00
Min
4.13

KT’s P/E Ratio of 21.05 is within the middle range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RCI

17.54

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

RCI’s P/E Ratio of 17.54 is within the middle range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KT

0.50

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.60
Median
1.62
Q1
0.94
Min
0.35

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, KT’s P/S Ratio of 0.50 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RCI

1.28

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

RCI’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KT

0.75

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
3.45
Median
2.10
Q1
1.19
Min
0.32

KT’s P/B Ratio of 0.75 is in the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RCI

1.97

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

RCI’s P/B Ratio of 1.97 is within the conventional range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KT vs. RCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKTRCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0517.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.501.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.751.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.7813.14