Seek Returns logo

KT vs. LBRDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KT and LBRDA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LBRDA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolKTLBRDA
Company NameKT CorporationLiberty Broadband Corporation
CountrySouth KoreaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryDiversified Telecommunication ServicesMedia
Market Capitalization9.34 billion USD9.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 26, 1999November 4, 2014
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KT and LBRDA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KT vs. LBRDA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKTLBRDA
5-Day Price Return0.20%2.15%
13-Week Price Return-9.38%-35.11%
26-Week Price Return2.71%-24.45%
52-Week Price Return-10.58%-17.92%
Month-to-Date Return1.39%-0.32%
Year-to-Date Return16.76%-15.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.33M0.15M
3-Month Volatility20.07%48.89%
Beta0.081.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KT

5.53%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.76%
Q3
16.39%
Median
9.92%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.54%

KT’s Return on Equity of 5.53% is on par with the norm for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LBRDA

10.91%

Media Industry

Max
31.00%
Q3
15.18%
Median
10.91%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-5.88%

LBRDA’s Return on Equity of 10.91% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KT

3.38%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.17%
Median
7.18%
Q1
1.75%
Min
-14.73%

KT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.38% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LBRDA

103.04%

Media Industry

Max
20.69%
Q3
11.93%
Median
6.49%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-4.90%

LBRDA’s Net Profit Margin of 103.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Media industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KT

5.11%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
14.86%
Q1
9.46%
Min
-9.42%

KT’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.11% is in the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LBRDA

8.94%

Media Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
13.57%
Median
9.15%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-6.28%

LBRDA’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.94% is around the midpoint for the Media industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKTLBRDA
Return on Equity (TTM)5.53%10.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.20%6.51%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.38%103.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.11%8.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.13%99.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KT

1.19

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.09
Median
0.91
Q1
0.70
Min
0.18

KT’s Current Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LBRDA

0.60

Media Industry

Max
3.59
Q3
1.97
Median
1.28
Q1
0.86
Min
0.33

LBRDA’s Current Ratio of 0.60 falls into the lower quartile for the Media industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KT

0.69

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.40
Q1
0.71
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, KT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LBRDA

0.32

Media Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.11
Median
0.55
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

LBRDA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Media industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KT

12.43

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
16.05
Q3
8.06
Median
3.53
Q1
1.36
Min
-2.60

KT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.43 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LBRDA

0.43

Media Industry

Max
58.38
Q3
25.12
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

LBRDA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.43 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKTLBRDA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.190.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.150.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.430.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

KT vs. LBRDA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KT vs. LBRDA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KT

4.33%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.69%
Q3
5.66%
Median
4.23%
Q1
1.76%
Min
0.00%

KT’s Dividend Yield of 4.33% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LBRDA

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
8.07%
Q3
3.69%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LBRDA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KT

39.35%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
273.77%
Q3
134.61%
Median
76.89%
Q1
41.79%
Min
0.00%

KT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.35% is in the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LBRDA

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
199.37%
Q3
102.15%
Median
47.09%
Q1
12.24%
Min
0.00%

LBRDA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKTLBRDA
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.33%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.35%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KT

13.28

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
42.43
Q3
27.51
Median
18.10
Q1
13.52
Min
4.10

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, KT’s P/E Ratio of 13.28 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LBRDA

8.44

Media Industry

Max
73.10
Q3
36.19
Median
15.22
Q1
11.43
Min
5.11

In the lower quartile for the Media industry, LBRDA’s P/E Ratio of 8.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KT

0.45

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.55
Q3
2.45
Median
1.74
Q1
0.98
Min
0.36

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, KT’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LBRDA

8.70

Media Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.14
Median
1.10
Q1
0.85
Min
0.21

With a P/S Ratio of 8.70, LBRDA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Media industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KT

0.82

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.27
Q3
3.97
Median
2.45
Q1
1.25
Min
0.27

KT’s P/B Ratio of 0.82 is in the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LBRDA

1.35

Media Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.53
Median
1.71
Q1
1.21
Min
0.56

LBRDA’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Media industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KT vs. LBRDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Media industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKTLBRDA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.288.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.458.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.821.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.49182.96