Seek Returns logo

KSPI vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KSPI and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KSPI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolKSPIUBER
Company NameJoint Stock Company Kaspi.kzUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryKazakhstanUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConsumer FinanceGround Transportation
Market Capitalization16.30 billion USD205.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 19, 2024May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KSPI and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KSPI vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKSPIUBER
5-Day Price Return-3.20%0.19%
13-Week Price Return-3.78%5.01%
26-Week Price Return-13.34%32.07%
52-Week Price Return-20.69%29.33%
Month-to-Date Return-13.07%4.50%
Year-to-Date Return-13.76%62.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M21.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M19.01M
3-Month Volatility41.83%28.08%
Beta0.861.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KSPI

67.04%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
32.87%
Q3
21.72%
Median
12.80%
Q1
9.07%
Min
-3.88%

KSPI’s Return on Equity of 67.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
19.68%
Q3
17.11%
Median
13.55%
Q1
9.71%
Min
-0.75%

Net Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
50.11%
Q3
32.02%
Median
19.92%
Q1
14.90%
Min
-5.45%

Operating Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKSPIUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)67.04%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.37%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
7.85
Q3
4.26
Median
2.28
Q1
0.82
Min
0.07

For the Consumer Finance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KSPI

0.29

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
6.63
Q3
3.60
Median
2.40
Q1
0.99
Min
0.23

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Consumer Finance industry.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
49.63
Q3
28.11
Median
4.75
Q1
2.86
Min
-15.69

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Consumer Finance industry.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKSPIUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)--1.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.290.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

KSPI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KSPI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KSPI

3.58%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
7.21%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.67%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.58%, KSPI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Finance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KSPI

78.77%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
145.89%
Q3
88.89%
Median
25.97%
Q1
9.25%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.77% is within the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKSPIUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.58%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)78.77%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KSPI

8.25

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
35.93
Q3
20.63
Median
12.65
Q1
9.73
Min
3.96

In the lower quartile for the Consumer Finance industry, KSPI’s P/E Ratio of 8.25 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER

15.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.79
Q3
2.71
Median
1.91
Q1
1.14
Min
0.61

P/S Ratio data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

UBER

4.27

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.27, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KSPI

4.68

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.83
Median
2.02
Q1
1.18
Min
0.26

At 4.68, KSPI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Finance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KSPI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Consumer Finance and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKSPIUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.2515.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)--4.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.688.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.0323.64