Seek Returns logo

KR vs. MDLZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KR and MDLZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MDLZ’s market capitalization of 89.33 billion USD is significantly greater than KR’s 46.50 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.57 for KR and 0.50 for MDLZ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolKRMDLZ
Company NameThe Kroger Co.Mondelez International, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryGrocery StoresFood Confectioners
CEODavid John Christopher KennerleyDirk Van de Put
Price69.83 USD68.99 USD
Market Cap46.50 billion USD89.33 billion USD
Beta0.570.50
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 2, 1977June 13, 2001
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KR and MDLZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KR vs. MDLZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

KR

40.38%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
41.83%
Q3
33.21%
Median
17.57%
Q1
4.85%
Min
-1.90%

In the upper quartile for the Grocery Stores industry, KR’s Return on Equity of 40.38% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MDLZ

13.31%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
37.69%
Q3
37.49%
Median
25.36%
Q1
12.55%
Min
10.29%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.31% is on par with the norm for the Food Confectioners industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

KR

6.71%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
9.72%
Q3
6.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
3.42%
Min
1.05%

KR’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.71% is in line with the norm for the Grocery Stores industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MDLZ

6.32%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
17.71%
Q3
14.38%
Median
9.80%
Q1
-20.38%
Min
-72.51%

MDLZ’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.32% is in line with the norm for the Food Confectioners industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

KR

4.22%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
5.53%
Q3
3.00%
Median
1.73%
Q1
1.16%
Min
-1.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 4.22% places KR in the upper quartile for the Grocery Stores industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDLZ

9.88%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
15.32%
Q3
13.13%
Median
11.66%
Q1
10.66%
Min
9.88%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Confectioners industry, MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

KR

3.81%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
4.30%
Q3
3.63%
Median
2.32%
Q1
1.32%
Min
0.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 3.81% places KR in the upper quartile for the Grocery Stores industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDLZ

11.79%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
17.05%
Median
15.39%
Q1
14.29%
Min
11.79%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.79% is in the lower quartile for the Food Confectioners industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKRMDLZ
Return on Equity (TTM)40.38%13.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.08%5.22%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.71%6.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.22%9.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.81%11.79%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.84%32.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

KR

0.95

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
1.20
Median
1.00
Q1
0.95
Min
0.90

KR’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Grocery Stores industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDLZ

0.61

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
1.59
Q3
1.20
Median
0.80
Q1
0.70
Min
0.61

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Confectioners industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

KR

2.83

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
4.19
Q3
2.56
Median
1.41
Q1
0.87
Min
0.12

KR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Grocery Stores industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.83. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MDLZ

0.78

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
1.59
Q3
1.40
Median
1.06
Q1
0.59
Min
0.01

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Food Confectioners industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

KR

4.55

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
24.50
Q3
16.36
Median
5.08
Q1
3.73
Min
-0.63

KR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.55 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Grocery Stores industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MDLZ

11.13

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
12.63
Q3
11.88
Median
11.13
Q1
8.85
Min
6.56

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.13 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Confectioners industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKRMDLZ
Current Ratio (TTM)0.950.61
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.530.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.830.78
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.470.29
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.033.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.5511.13

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for KR and MDLZ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

KR

1.83%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.48%
Q1
0.26%
Min
0.00%

KR’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is consistent with its peers in the Grocery Stores industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MDLZ

2.73%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
3.28%
Q3
2.98%
Median
2.80%
Q1
2.16%
Min
0.53%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 2.73% is consistent with its peers in the Food Confectioners industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

KR

20.55%

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
4,966.68%
Q3
30.78%
Median
24.38%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.55% is within the typical range for the Grocery Stores industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDLZ

66.48%

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
66.48%
Q3
65.91%
Median
61.19%
Q1
49.66%
Min
28.65%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.48% is in the upper quartile for the Food Confectioners industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKRMDLZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.83%2.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.55%66.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

KR

11.22

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
35.78
Q3
21.80
Median
18.09
Q1
11.47
Min
8.82

In the lower quartile for the Grocery Stores industry, KR’s P/E Ratio of 11.22 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MDLZ

25.65

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
27.38
Q3
25.74
Median
22.87
Q1
20.36
Min
19.81

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 25.65 is within the middle range for the Food Confectioners industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

KR

2.08

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
3.62
Median
2.13
Q1
0.83
Min
0.05

KR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.08 is within the middle range of its peers in the Grocery Stores industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

MDLZ

2.93

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
11.13
Q3
8.03
Median
4.93
Q1
2.65
Min
1.94

MDLZ’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.93 is within the middle range of its peers in the Food Confectioners industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

KR

0.46

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
0.69
Q3
0.45
Median
0.28
Q1
0.22
Min
0.14

KR’s P/S Ratio of 0.46 is in the upper echelon for the Grocery Stores industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MDLZ

2.45

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
3.38
Median
2.78
Q1
2.35
Min
2.17

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Confectioners industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

KR

5.42

Grocery Stores Industry

Max
5.54
Q3
4.47
Median
2.48
Q1
1.04
Min
0.41

KR’s P/B Ratio of 5.42 is in the upper tier for the Grocery Stores industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MDLZ

3.58

Food Confectioners Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
7.04
Median
5.25
Q1
3.33
Min
2.77

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Food Confectioners industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KR vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Grocery Stores and Food Confectioners industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKRMDLZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)11.2225.65
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.082.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.462.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.423.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.1826.96
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)5.8218.13
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.702.96