Seek Returns logo

KO vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KO and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KO is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolKOTM
Company NameThe Coca-Cola CompanyToyota Motor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBeveragesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization284.56 billion USD258.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KO and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KO vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKOTM
5-Day Price Return0.03%7.27%
13-Week Price Return-4.84%21.11%
26-Week Price Return-9.65%14.39%
52-Week Price Return-4.19%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return-0.30%5.60%
Year-to-Date Return6.20%-4.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.26M26.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.85M27.73M
3-Month Volatility13.30%36.08%
Beta0.401.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KO

45.90%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, KO’s Return on Equity of 45.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KO

25.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KO’s Net Profit Margin of 25.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Beverages industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KO

29.32%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.32% places KO in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKOTM
Return on Equity (TTM)45.90%12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.80%4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.89%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.32%9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.43%19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KO

1.21

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KO’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KO

1.73

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KO

67.13

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

KO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 67.13 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKOTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.211.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.841.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.731.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)67.13--

Growth

Revenue Growth

KO vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KO vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KO

2.96%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KO’s Dividend Yield of 2.96% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

2.99%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KO

69.42%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 69.42% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKOTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.96%2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)69.42%38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KO

23.42

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

A P/E Ratio of 23.42 places KO in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TM

9.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

TM’s P/E Ratio of 9.22 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KO

6.06

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 6.06, KO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TM

0.81

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KO

10.59

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 10.59, KO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKOTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.429.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.060.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.591.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.7954.11