Seek Returns logo

KMX vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KMX and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KMX is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolKMXXPEV
Company NameCarMax, Inc.XPeng Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobiles
Market Capitalization8.68 billion USD18.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 4, 1997August 27, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KMX and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KMX vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKMXXPEV
5-Day Price Return-0.57%5.11%
13-Week Price Return-14.95%1.95%
26-Week Price Return-34.01%27.71%
52-Week Price Return-28.02%182.92%
Month-to-Date Return2.12%11.86%
Year-to-Date Return-29.29%72.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.53M9.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.32M7.30M
3-Month Volatility34.29%53.41%
Beta1.332.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KMX

8.96%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

KMX’s Return on Equity of 8.96% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KMX

2.08%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s Net Profit Margin of 2.08% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KMX

2.78%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

KMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.78% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKMXXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)8.96%-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.04%-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.08%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.78%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.20%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

2.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

KMX’s Current Ratio of 2.39 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

3.02

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

KMX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KMX

--

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for KMX is currently unavailable.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKMXXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.391.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.020.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

KMX vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KMX vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKMXXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KMX

15.58

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

KMX’s P/E Ratio of 15.58 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KMX

0.32

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

1.54

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

KMX’s P/B Ratio of 1.54 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KMX vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKMXXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.58--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.322.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.544.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.58--