KMX vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 17, 2025

Here’s a clear look at KMX and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KMX is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
Company Name	CarMax, Inc.	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Specialty Retail	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	6.51 billion USD	10.08 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 4, 1997	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KMX and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KMX vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	-3.71%	0.20%
13-Week Price Return	-34.06%	35.70%
26-Week Price Return	-41.98%	37.90%
52-Week Price Return	-38.62%	18.28%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.14%	4.12%
Year-to-Date Return	-45.74%	51.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.86M	2.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.69M	2.75M
3-Month Volatility	49.62%	29.12%
Beta	1.31	0.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KMX

8.36%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 64.63%
Q3: 37.13%
Median: 19.07%
Q1: 10.79%
Min: -16.66%

KMX’s Return on Equity of 8.36% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 47.53%
Q3: 31.20%
Median: 16.63%
Q1: 10.81%
Min: -7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KMX

1.98%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 21.04%
Q3: 10.99%
Median: 6.08%
Q1: 2.46%
Min: -4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.98% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 24.63%
Q3: 12.77%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 4.50%
Min: -1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KMX

2.64%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 33.35%
Q3: 16.40%
Median: 9.28%
Q1: 4.05%
Min: -10.63%

KMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.64% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.48%
Q3: 17.60%
Median: 10.82%
Q1: 7.76%
Min: -6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.36%	17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.91%	9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.98%	6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	2.64%	7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	11.21%	23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

2.46

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 2.72
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.15
Min: 0.52

KMX’s Current Ratio of 2.46 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

3.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 1.57
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

KMX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.01
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KMX

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 48.12
Q3: 39.12
Median: 14.13
Q1: 3.63
Min: -36.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for KMX is currently unavailable.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 21.16
Median: 8.60
Q1: 3.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.46	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.06	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.03	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

KMX vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KMX vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 6.48%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

KMX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 4.06%
Q3: 2.07%
Median: 0.37%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 192.64%
Q3: 79.43%
Median: 26.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

KMX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 114.82%
Q3: 62.39%
Median: 28.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KMX

12.58

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 47.04
Q3: 27.74
Median: 23.51
Q1: 13.77
Min: 7.47

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/E Ratio of 12.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VIPS

10.37

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 62.76
Q3: 32.50
Median: 17.65
Q1: 12.08
Min: 6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KMX

0.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.77
Q3: 2.79
Median: 1.21
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.25
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KMX

1.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 16.93
Q3: 7.92
Median: 3.98
Q1: 1.86
Min: 0.55

KMX’s P/B Ratio of 1.48 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 8.81
Q3: 5.19
Median: 3.42
Q1: 1.75
Min: 0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KMX vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	KMX	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	12.58	10.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.25	0.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.48	1.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.84	--