Seek Returns logo

KMB vs. STZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KMB and STZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKMBSTZ
Company NameKimberly-Clark CorporationConstellation Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization34.73 billion USD23.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KMB and STZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KMB vs. STZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKMBSTZ
5-Day Price Return0.90%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return-21.76%-21.23%
26-Week Price Return-22.39%-29.88%
52-Week Price Return-21.31%-45.88%
Month-to-Date Return-13.11%-0.32%
Year-to-Date Return-20.62%-40.74%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.35M2.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.44M2.49M
3-Month Volatility33.58%26.66%
Beta0.290.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KMB

173.33%

Household Products Industry

Max
173.33%
Q3
128.99%
Median
18.47%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

In the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, KMB’s Return on Equity of 173.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STZ

16.60%

Beverages Industry

Max
47.01%
Q3
22.97%
Median
10.24%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-16.74%

STZ’s Return on Equity of 16.60% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

10.89%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.68%
Q3
12.48%
Median
9.30%
Q1
8.70%
Min
5.05%

KMB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.89% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STZ

12.70%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.65%
Q3
12.41%
Median
8.66%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-5.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.70% places STZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

13.98%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.46%
Q3
16.57%
Median
14.01%
Q1
12.86%
Min
12.78%

KMB’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Household Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STZ

23.18%

Beverages Industry

Max
31.42%
Q3
20.65%
Median
13.47%
Q1
9.66%
Min
2.33%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.18% places STZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKMBSTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)173.33%16.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.84%5.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.89%12.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%23.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.47%51.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

0.77

Household Products Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.98
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.50

KMB’s Current Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STZ

1.08

Beverages Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
1.91
Median
1.22
Q1
0.83
Min
0.55

STZ’s Current Ratio of 1.08 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

5.51

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.51, KMB operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

STZ

1.41

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.09
Median
0.73
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

STZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.41. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KMB

14.18

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.34
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

KMB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.18 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STZ

0.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

STZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.81 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKMBSTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.771.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.560.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)5.511.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.180.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

KMB vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KMB vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KMB

4.74%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.56%
Q3
3.53%
Median
3.05%
Q1
2.11%
Min
1.42%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.74%, KMB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

STZ

3.22%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.61%
Q3
4.81%
Median
3.32%
Q1
2.18%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KMB

83.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
189.95%
Q3
111.93%
Median
74.93%
Q1
56.30%
Min
30.76%

KMB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 83.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STZ

34.03%

Beverages Industry

Max
193.57%
Q3
102.38%
Median
72.98%
Q1
39.04%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.03% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKMBSTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.74%3.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)83.80%34.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KMB

17.68

Household Products Industry

Max
31.74
Q3
25.68
Median
20.54
Q1
14.94
Min
14.20

KMB’s P/E Ratio of 17.68 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STZ

18.39

Beverages Industry

Max
36.07
Q3
23.27
Median
18.39
Q1
14.57
Min
6.38

STZ’s P/E Ratio of 18.39 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KMB

1.93

Household Products Industry

Max
4.24
Q3
2.79
Median
1.94
Q1
1.34
Min
1.04

KMB’s P/S Ratio of 1.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STZ

2.34

Beverages Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.29
Median
1.56
Q1
0.91
Min
0.38

STZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

30.97

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
20.24
Median
5.19
Q1
2.28
Min
1.41

KMB’s P/B Ratio of 30.97 is in the upper tier for the Household Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

STZ

3.81

Beverages Industry

Max
7.45
Q3
4.03
Median
2.20
Q1
1.39
Min
0.83

STZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KMB vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKMBSTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.6818.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.932.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)30.973.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.8212.17