Seek Returns logo

KLAC vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KLAC and SNOW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKLACSNOW
Company NameKLA CorporationSnowflake Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization149.46 billion USD86.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 8, 1980September 16, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KLAC and SNOW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KLAC vs. SNOW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKLACSNOW
5-Day Price Return-6.87%-4.28%
13-Week Price Return29.65%29.10%
26-Week Price Return42.52%41.98%
52-Week Price Return75.99%96.60%
Month-to-Date Return-6.16%-6.50%
Year-to-Date Return80.02%66.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.07M3.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.01M4.93M
3-Month Volatility42.14%52.89%
Beta1.461.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KLAC

98.15%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 98.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SNOW

-51.54%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -51.54%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KLAC

33.83%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.83% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNOW

-33.53%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -33.53%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KLAC

39.86%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.86% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SNOW

-38.18%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -38.18%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKLACSNOW
Return on Equity (TTM)98.15%-51.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)27.08%-16.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)33.83%-33.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.86%-38.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.99%66.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

2.69

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.69 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNOW

1.48

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

1.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

KLAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SNOW

0.96

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKLACSNOW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.691.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.851.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.180.96
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.22--

Growth

Revenue Growth

KLAC vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KLAC vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KLAC

0.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

22.67%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.67% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKLACSNOW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.67%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

34.88

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 34.88 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

11.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 11.80 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNOW

20.73

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 20.73, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

28.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

At 28.49, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SNOW

31.43

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

At 31.43, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KLAC vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKLACSNOW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.88--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.8020.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)28.4931.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.16116.27
KLAC vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison