Seek Returns logo

KLAC vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KLAC and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKLACRBLX
Company NameKLA CorporationRoblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization148.65 billion USD93.63 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 8, 1980March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KLAC and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KLAC vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKLACRBLX
5-Day Price Return0.93%4.05%
13-Week Price Return20.41%31.67%
26-Week Price Return52.88%129.49%
52-Week Price Return37.86%213.54%
Month-to-Date Return23.69%11.18%
Year-to-Date Return71.17%139.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.97M7.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.03M8.52M
3-Month Volatility33.33%50.92%
Beta1.521.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KLAC

102.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 102.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KLAC

33.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.41% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KLAC

39.28%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.28% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKLACRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)102.56%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.23%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)33.41%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.28%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.99%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

2.62

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.62 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

1.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.25, KLAC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKLACRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.620.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.780.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.252.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.22-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

KLAC vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KLAC vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KLAC

0.61%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.61% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

22.27%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.27% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKLACRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.61%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.27%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

36.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 36.63 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KLAC

12.24

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 12.24 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RBLX

23.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

With a P/S Ratio of 23.10, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KLAC

25.24

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

At 25.24, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KLAC vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKLACRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.63--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.2423.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)25.24202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.7798.68