Seek Returns logo

KIM vs. OHI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KIM and OHI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and OHI are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolKIMOHI
Company NameKimco Realty CorporationOmega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryRetail REITsHealth Care REITs
Market Capitalization15.03 billion USD12.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991August 7, 1992
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and OHI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. OHI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKIMOHI
5-Day Price Return2.30%1.84%
13-Week Price Return7.71%16.75%
26-Week Price Return3.11%16.98%
52-Week Price Return-2.72%9.48%
Month-to-Date Return4.57%8.05%
Year-to-Date Return-5.25%11.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.19M2.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.44M2.51M
3-Month Volatility19.80%16.36%
Beta1.350.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
15.84%
Q3
10.01%
Median
5.58%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.65%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

OHI

10.19%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
10.72%
Q3
6.35%
Median
5.14%
Q1
1.99%
Min
1.33%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care REITs industry, OHI’s Return on Equity of 10.19% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
72.99%
Q3
48.25%
Median
27.21%
Q1
13.68%
Min
-25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

OHI

42.23%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
65.42%
Q3
41.17%
Median
26.13%
Q1
5.90%
Min
-44.62%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
53.88%
Median
35.05%
Q1
20.90%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

OHI

39.67%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
86.51%
Q3
46.69%
Median
36.79%
Q1
14.52%
Min
-33.46%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKIMOHI
Return on Equity (TTM)5.66%10.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%4.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.54%42.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%39.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.89%98.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.87
Median
0.60
Q1
0.39
Min
0.04

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

OHI

2.86

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.92
Median
1.21
Q1
0.19
Min
0.07

OHI’s Current Ratio of 2.86 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.36
Median
0.93
Q1
0.64
Min
0.28

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

OHI

1.00

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.00
Median
0.89
Q1
0.65
Min
0.28

OHI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.35
Median
2.33
Q1
1.37
Min
0.52

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

OHI

1.72

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
5.10
Q3
3.14
Median
1.96
Q1
1.08
Min
-1.73

OHI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKIMOHI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.472.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.472.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.781.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.051.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. OHI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. OHI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.78%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.40%
Q3
4.96%
Median
4.61%
Q1
3.75%
Min
2.91%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.78% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OHI

6.07%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
8.28%
Q3
6.85%
Median
5.55%
Q1
4.58%
Min
1.56%

OHI’s Dividend Yield of 6.07% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
233.72%
Q3
148.83%
Median
90.03%
Q1
67.83%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OHI

156.88%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
234.45%
Q3
210.75%
Median
158.46%
Q1
117.20%
Min
0.00%

OHI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 156.88% is within the typical range for the Health Care REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKIMOHI
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.78%6.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.45%156.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.58

Retail REITs Industry

Max
69.12
Q3
38.21
Median
21.85
Q1
15.96
Min
6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

OHI

25.86

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
96.07
Q3
55.85
Median
27.80
Q1
24.06
Min
14.42

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Health Care REITs industry.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

7.02

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.84
Q3
9.05
Median
7.00
Q1
5.56
Min
2.93

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OHI

10.92

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
18.19
Q3
10.43
Median
6.09
Q1
4.41
Min
2.67

OHI’s P/S Ratio of 10.92 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.75
Q3
1.73
Median
1.08
Q1
0.87
Min
0.48

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OHI

2.13

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.26
Median
1.54
Q1
0.86
Min
0.76

OHI’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Health Care REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM vs. OHI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKIMOHI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.5825.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.0210.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.352.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.2547.44