Seek Returns logo

KIM vs. MAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KIM and MAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and MAC are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolKIMMAC
Company NameKimco Realty CorporationThe Macerich Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryRetail REITsRetail REITs
Market Capitalization14.58 billion USD4.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991March 10, 1994
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and MAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. MAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKIMMAC
5-Day Price Return1.60%7.78%
13-Week Price Return-0.19%8.04%
26-Week Price Return-3.93%-13.50%
52-Week Price Return-1.01%22.90%
Month-to-Date Return1.41%6.94%
Year-to-Date Return-8.11%-10.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.72M2.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.87M1.91M
3-Month Volatility21.12%37.76%
Beta1.352.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
15.84%
Q3
10.01%
Median
5.58%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.65%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MAC

-9.36%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
15.84%
Q3
10.01%
Median
5.58%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.65%

MAC has a negative Return on Equity of -9.36%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
72.99%
Q3
48.25%
Median
27.21%
Q1
13.68%
Min
-25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

MAC

-25.48%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
72.99%
Q3
48.25%
Median
27.21%
Q1
13.68%
Min
-25.48%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
53.88%
Median
35.05%
Q1
20.90%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MAC

-44.38%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
53.88%
Median
35.05%
Q1
20.90%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKIMMAC
Return on Equity (TTM)5.66%-9.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%-3.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.54%-25.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%-44.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.89%64.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.87
Median
0.60
Q1
0.39
Min
0.04

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MAC

0.89

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.87
Median
0.60
Q1
0.39
Min
0.04

MAC’s Current Ratio of 0.89 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.36
Median
0.93
Q1
0.64
Min
0.28

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MAC

1.96

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.36
Median
0.93
Q1
0.64
Min
0.28

MAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Retail REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.96. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.35
Median
2.33
Q1
1.37
Min
0.52

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAC

0.52

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.35
Median
2.33
Q1
1.37
Min
0.52

MAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.52 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKIMMAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.470.89
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.781.96
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.050.52

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. MAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. MAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.91%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.40%
Q3
4.96%
Median
4.61%
Q1
3.75%
Min
2.91%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.91% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAC

3.63%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.40%
Q3
4.96%
Median
4.61%
Q1
3.75%
Min
2.91%

MAC’s Dividend Yield of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
233.72%
Q3
148.83%
Median
90.03%
Q1
67.83%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAC

36.04%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
233.72%
Q3
148.83%
Median
90.03%
Q1
67.83%
Min
12.86%

MAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.04% is in the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKIMMAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.91%3.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.45%36.04%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

23.94

Retail REITs Industry

Max
69.12
Q3
38.21
Median
21.85
Q1
15.96
Min
6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

MAC

--

Retail REITs Industry

Max
69.12
Q3
38.21
Median
21.85
Q1
15.96
Min
6.82

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

6.83

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.84
Q3
9.05
Median
7.00
Q1
5.56
Min
2.93

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 6.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MAC

4.60

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.84
Q3
9.05
Median
7.00
Q1
5.56
Min
2.93

In the lower quartile for the Retail REITs industry, MAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.60 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.75
Q3
1.73
Median
1.08
Q1
0.87
Min
0.48

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAC

1.63

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.75
Q3
1.73
Median
1.08
Q1
0.87
Min
0.48

MAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.63 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM vs. MAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Retail REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKIMMAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.94--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.834.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.351.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.4525.58